Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro M500M
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro M500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 580 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro M500M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro M500M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 or Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro M500M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M500M has 100% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 679 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M500M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−12
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
14−16
5−6
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 137% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
150−160
110−120
medium / 768p
130−140
85−90
ultra / 1080p
65−70
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
18−20
high / 768p
95−100
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
70−75
50−55
ultra / 1080p
40−45
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
10−11
1−2
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
10−12
medium / 1080p
10−12
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
16−18
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 65% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
14−16
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
6−7
1−2
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
6−7
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
high / 1080p
95−100
70−75
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
30−35
14−16
medium / 768p
21−24
10−11
high / 1080p
10−12
5−6
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
high / 768p
40−45
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro M500M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro M500M
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Maxwell
Code name
Skylake GT4e
GM108
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
15 December 2015
Pipelines
72
384
Core clock speed
350 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1124 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
17.98
Floating-point performance
863.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4004 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price