Quadro M500M vs Radeon HD 7670A
When comparing Quadro M500M and Radeon HD 7670A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M500M and Radeon HD 7670A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 7670A
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M500M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7670A has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M500M has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro M500M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- Quadro M500M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 429 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro M500M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M500M is 4 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro M500M and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Quadro M500M and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| Quadro M500M and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro M500M and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| Quadro M500M and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M500M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GM108 | Turks |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 December 2015 | 5 January 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4004 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |