Quadro M500M vs Radeon R7 M465X
When comparing Quadro M500M and Radeon R7 M465X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M500M and Radeon R7 M465X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M465X
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M500M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M500M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M500M and Radeon R7 M465X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro M500M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M500M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 129 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Quadro M500M and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 496 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Dota 2 is 28% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Far Cry 5 is 180% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Fortnite is 55% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in World of Tanks is 19% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M500M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 December 2015 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4004 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |