Quadro M500M vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Quadro M500M and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M500M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M500M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- Quadro M500M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
- Quadro M500M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Quadro M500M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 455 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Quadro M500M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M500M is 872 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 60% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 31% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| Quadro M500M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| Quadro M500M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M500M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | GM108 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 December 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4004 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |