GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M520
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Quadro M520, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro M520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 500% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- Quadro M520 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 544 MHz higher, than Quadro M520.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M520 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro M520 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | GF104 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 756 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 40 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |