GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro M520
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M520.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro M520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 540% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- Quadro M520 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 23 MHz higher, than Quadro M520.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M520 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 2% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro M520 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GF114 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 756 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 40 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |