GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro M520
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro M520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 120% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M520 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M520 is 128 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro M520 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK106 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 756 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1019 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 40 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |