GRID K160Q vs Quadro M520
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Quadro M520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Quadro M520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 25 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 420% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- Quadro M520 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 94 MHz higher, than Quadro M520.
- GRID K160Q and Quadro M520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GRID K160Q and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Dota 2 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Fortnite is 126% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 62% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Quadro M520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK107 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 756 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 40 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |