GRID K260Q vs Quadro M520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K260Q and Quadro M520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro M520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K260Q
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Quadro M520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 25 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 800% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro M520 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M520 is 11 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro M520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 28% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 41% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Quadro M520. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Quadro M520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 756 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 40 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |