GRID M6 8Q vs Quadro M520
When choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Quadro M520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M6 8Q and Quadro M520.
GRID M6 8Q
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Quadro M520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 300% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M520.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M520 is 34 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q and Quadro M520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 70% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Quadro M520 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM204 | |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 756 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 40 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |