Quadro 6000 vs Quadro M520
In this comparison between Quadro 6000 and Quadro M520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 6000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 6000
Quadro M520
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
25 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 6000 has 716% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
Quadro 6000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M520.
Quadro 6000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro 6000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M520 is 182 MHz higher, than Quadro 6000.
Quadro 6000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M520 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
9−10
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 41% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
45−50
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro 6000 and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
160−170
medium / 768p
170−180
130−140
ultra / 1080p
90−95
65−70
QHD / 1440p
50−55
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
130−140
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
90−95
70−75
ultra / 1080p
60−65
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Dota 2 is 22% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
16−18
10−12
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
90−95
70−75
medium / 1080p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
8−9
3−4
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
27−30
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
80−85
60−65
medium / 768p
70−75
55−60
high / 1080p
27−30
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−12
8−9
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
9−10
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
90−95
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
50−55
35−40
medium / 768p
30−35
21−24
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
100−105
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
high / 768p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Quadro M520.
Full Specs
Quadro 6000
Quadro M520
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
GF100
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
10 December 2010
13 January 2017
Pipelines
448
384
Core clock speed
574 MHz
756 MHz
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,027.7 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth
143.4 GB/s
40 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
91 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
nView Display Management
+
3D Stereo
+
Check Price
Check Price
