Quadro K2200 vs Quadro M520
In this comparison between Quadro K2200 and Quadro M520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200
Quadro M520
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
25 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2200 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
Quadro K2200 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M520.
Quadro K2200 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro K2200 and Quadro M520 are build with Maxwell architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 290 MHz higher, than Quadro M520.
Quadro K2200 and Quadro M520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
18−20
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
27−30
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
220−230
160−170
medium / 768p
190−200
130−140
ultra / 1080p
110−120
65−70
QHD / 1440p
75−80
35−40
4K / 2160p
40−45
27−30
high / 768p
160−170
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
45−50
24−27
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
medium / 768p
100−110
70−75
ultra / 1080p
75−80
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
21−24
10−12
ultra / 1080p
20−22
10−11
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
45−50
24−27
medium / 1080p
24−27
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
27−30
18−20
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
110−120
70−75
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 70% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
10−12
3−4
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
95−100
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
55−60
high / 1080p
35−40
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
8−9
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
10−12
6−7
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
90−95
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Quadro M520.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
65−70
35−40
medium / 768p
40−45
21−24
high / 1080p
21−24
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than Quadro M520.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
35−40
24−27
high / 768p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Quadro M520.
Full Specs
Quadro K2200
Quadro M520
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Code name
GM107
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
22 July 2014
13 January 2017
Pipelines
640
384
Core clock speed
1046 MHz
756 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1019 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
44.96
Floating-point performance
1,439 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
40 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
162 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.6 Mh/s
nView Display Management
+
3D Stereo
+
Check Price
Check Price
