Quadro M520 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M520 and Radeon Pro WX 5100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M520 stacks up against Radeon Pro WX 5100, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M520 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M520.
- Quadro M520 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M520 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M520 is 43 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- Quadro M520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 158% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro M520. |
Full Specs
Quadro M520 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 13 January 2017 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 756 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | 1086 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 40 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M520 vs GeForce MX230
- Quadro M520 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce MX230
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Quadro M520 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Quadro M520 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics