Quadro M520 vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Quadro M520 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M520 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M520 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 852% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M520.
- Quadro M520 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M520 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M520 is 182 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro M520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 58% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M520 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | GF100 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 756 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 40 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |