Quadro M520 vs Tesla M6
When choosing between Quadro M520 and Tesla M6, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M520 and Tesla M6.
Tesla M6
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M520 | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 300% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M520.
- Quadro M520 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M520 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 174 MHz higher, than Quadro M520.
- Quadro M520 and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 294% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 223% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 283% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 172% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 337% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 294% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M520 | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 756 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 113.3 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 40 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |