FirePro M4150 vs Quadro M600M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and Quadro M600M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro M600M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro M600M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M600M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 122 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Quadro M600M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M4150 and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Dota 2 is 54% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Fortnite is 94% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Minecraft is 19% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro M600M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Opal | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 14.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |