Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro M6000 vs Quadro M600M

    In this comparison between FirePro M6000 and Quadro M600M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M600M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    FirePro M6000 Check Price
    Quadro M600M Check Price

    FirePro M6000 and Quadro M600M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: FirePro M6000 and Quadro M600M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 or Quadro M600M here:

    FirePro M6000 Laptops
    Quadro M600M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro M6000 Quadro M600M
    Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 30 Watt
    Interface MXM-B (3.0) MXM-A (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro M6000 has 43% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
    • FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • FirePro M6000 and Quadro M600M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 87 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
    • FirePro M6000 and Quadro M600M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 512 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 8−9 10−11
    ultra / 1080p 5−6 6−7
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 1−2
    low / 720p 20−22 21−24
    medium / 1080p 10−12 12−14
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than FirePro M6000.

    Full Specs

      FirePro M6000 Quadro M600M
    Architecture GCN Maxwell
    Code name Heathrow GM107
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 July 2012 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 640 384
    Core clock speed 750 MHz 837 MHz
    Boost Clock 876 MHz
    Transistor count 1,500 million 1,870 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 32.00 14.02
    Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops 863.2 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 5012 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s 80 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12
    Shader Model 5.1 5.0
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
    CUDA 5.0
    Bus support n/a
    Laptop size medium sized large
    Optimus +
    Form factor MXM-B
    StereoOutput3D +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares