FirePro S7150 vs Quadro M600M
When comparing FirePro S7150 and Quadro M600M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7150 and Quadro M600M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7150
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro M600M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 83 MHz higher, than Quadro M600M.
- FirePro S7150 and Quadro M600M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 12 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 175% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Quadro M600M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro M600M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tonga | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 837 MHz |
Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 14.02 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |