Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro V4900 vs Quadro M600M

    When comparing FirePro V4900 and Quadro M600M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V4900 and Quadro M600M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    FirePro V4900 Check Price
    Quadro M600M Check Price

    Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:

    Quadro M600M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro V4900 Quadro M600M
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 30 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro V4900 has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
    • FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • Quadro M600M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
    • FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
    • FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 37 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
    • FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M600M - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 2−3 10−11
    ultra / 1080p 1−2 6−7
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 1−2
    low / 720p 12−14 21−24
    medium / 1080p 4−5 12−14
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than FirePro V4900.

    Full Specs

      FirePro V4900 Quadro M600M
    Architecture TeraScale 2 Maxwell
    Code name Turks GM107
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 November 2011 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 480 384
    Core clock speed 800 MHz 837 MHz
    Boost Clock 876 MHz
    Transistor count 716 million 1,870 million
    Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 19.20 14.02
    Floating-point performance 768.0 gflops 863.2 gflops
    Length 163 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 5012 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s 80 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12
    Shader Model 5.0 5.0
    OpenGL 4.4 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan N/A 1.1.126
    CUDA 5.0
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 73 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares