FirePro W7100 vs Quadro M600M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W7100 and Quadro M600M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W7100 and Quadro M600M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W7100
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Quadro M600M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 1233% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W7100 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 83 MHz higher, than Quadro M600M.
- FirePro W7100 and Quadro M600M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 12 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 175% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Quadro M600M | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tonga | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 August 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 14.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |