FireStream 9270 vs Quadro M600M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Quadro M600M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro M600M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro M600M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 433% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Quadro M600M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 87 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M600M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 1412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Fortnite is 57% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 70% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro M600M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 14.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |