FireStream 9370 vs Quadro M600M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and Quadro M600M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro M600M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro M600M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 12 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M600M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 16% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro M600M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cypress | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 14.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |