GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M600M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Quadro M600M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro M600M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M600M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 463 MHz higher, than Quadro M600M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M600M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 3312 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro M600M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | GF104 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 14.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |