GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Quadro M600M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Quadro M600M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 750 Ti will be the best choice, for others Quadro M600M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Quadro M600M
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Quadro M600M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Quadro M600M are build with Maxwell architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 183 MHz higher, than Quadro M600M.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Quadro M600M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 5007 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
6−7
QHD / 1440p
6−7
1−2
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
24−27
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 110% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
27−30
14−16
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
35−40
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
230−240
170−180
medium / 768p
200−210
140−150
ultra / 1080p
120−130
75−80
QHD / 1440p
90−95
40−45
4K / 2160p
50−55
30−33
high / 768p
160−170
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
120−130
95−100
medium / 768p
100−110
75−80
ultra / 1080p
80−85
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−12
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
27−30
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 92% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
30−35
18−20
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
120−130
75−80
medium / 1080p
70−75
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Fortnite is 70% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
30−35
18−20
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
QHD / 1440p
14−16
4−5
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
35−40
medium / 1080p
35−40
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
100−110
65−70
medium / 768p
90−95
60−65
high / 1080p
40−45
20−22
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
12−14
7−8
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
40−45
20−22
medium / 1080p
18−20
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
90−95
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−105
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
20−22
medium / 1080p
21−24
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
70−75
35−40
medium / 768p
45−50
24−27
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
8−9
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 83% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
40−45
27−30
high / 768p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro M600M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Quadro M600M
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Code name
GM107
GM107
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
18 February 2014
2 October 2015
Pipelines
640
384
Core clock speed
1020 MHz
837 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
876 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
43.40
14.02
Floating-point performance
1,389 gflops
863.2 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.4 GB/s
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.25 kh/s
CUDA cores
640
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
183 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.51 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.3 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
74.4 Sol/s
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
