GRID K520 vs Quadro M600M
When comparing GRID K520 and Quadro M600M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro M600M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro M600M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 92 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Quadro M600M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 43% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Quadro M600M. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro M600M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 837 MHz |
Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 14.02 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |