Quadro 2000D vs Quadro M600M
When comparing Quadro 2000D and Quadro M600M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000D and Quadro M600M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro M600M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 106% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M600M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 212 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M600M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 2412 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro 2000D and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Dota 2 is 54% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Fortnite is 94% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Minecraft is 19% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro M600M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | GF106 | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 14.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |