Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro CX vs Quadro M600M

    In this comparison between Quadro CX and Quadro M600M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro CX will be the best choice, for others Quadro M600M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Quadro CX
    Quadro M600M Check Price

    Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:

    Quadro M600M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro CX Quadro M600M
    Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 30 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
    Memory type GDDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video No outputs
      Check Price
    • Quadro CX has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
    • Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
    • Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 235 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
    • Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M600M - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 1−2 10−11
    ultra / 1080p 0−1 6−7
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 1−2
    low / 720p 10−12 21−24
    medium / 1080p 2−3 12−14
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro CX.

    Full Specs

      Quadro CX Quadro M600M
    Architecture Tesla 2.0 Maxwell
    Code name GT200B GM107
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 11 November 2008 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 192 384
    Core clock speed 602 MHz 837 MHz
    Boost Clock 876 MHz
    Transistor count 1,400 million 1,870 million
    Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 38.53 14.02
    Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops 863.2 gflops
    Length 267 mm
    Memory bus width 384 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 5012 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s 80 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 11.1 (10_0) 12
    Shader Model 4.0 5.0
    OpenGL 3.3 4.5
    OpenCL 1.1 1.2
    Vulkan N/A 1.1.126
    CUDA 1.3 5.0
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price

    Similar compares