Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro M600M
When comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M600M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M600M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro M600M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 260% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M600M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 237 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M600M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Fortnite is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Metro Exodus is 2000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro M600M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 14.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 5.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |