Quadro M600M vs Radeon R9 M270X
In this comparison between Quadro M600M and Radeon R9 M270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M600M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M270X
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M600M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M600M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro M600M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M600M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 112 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Quadro M600M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 3887 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M600M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Fortnite is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in World of Tanks is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M600M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 14.02 | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |