Quadro M600M vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M600M and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M600M stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M600M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 693% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro M600M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro M600M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M600M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 263 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro M600M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 2024 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 70% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 59% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 45% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Quadro M600M. |
Full Specs
Quadro M600M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 14.02 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.0 | 2.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |