Quadro M600M vs Tesla T4
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M600M and Tesla T4, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M600M stacks up against Tesla T4, check out specs charts below.
Tesla T4
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M600M | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 133% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro M600M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro M600M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M600M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 252 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Quadro M600M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 4988 MHz higher, than Quadro M600M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 175% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Quadro M600M. |
Full Specs
Quadro M600M | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
Code name | GM107 | TU104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 14.02 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 7.5 |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |