FirePro S9000 vs Quadro M620
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and Quadro M620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro M620 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 1066% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M620.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M620 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M620 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 118 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and Quadro M620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 488 MHz higher, than Quadro M620.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 107% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 92% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro M620 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tahiti | |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1018 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |