GeForce 920A vs Quadro M620
In this comparison between GeForce 920A and Quadro M620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others Quadro M620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Quadro M620 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 920A has 10% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro M620 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M620 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M620 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 64 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro M620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 3010 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 446% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Quadro M620 | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK208B | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1018 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |