GRID K520 vs Quadro M620
When comparing GRID K520 and Quadro M620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro M620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro M620 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M620.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M620 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M620 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 273 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Quadro M620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 9% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GRID K520 and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro M620. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro M620 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1018 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |