GRID M60 2Q vs Quadro M620
In this comparison between GRID M60 2Q and Quadro M620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 2Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Quadro M620 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
- GRID M60 2Q and Quadro M620 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M620 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M620 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 461 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q and Quadro M620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q and Quadro M620 is 5012 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 107% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 92% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M620. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Quadro M620 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GM204 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 1018 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |