Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro M620
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro M620, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 4800 stacks up against Quadro M620, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 4800
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro M620 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro M620.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M620 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M620 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 416 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M620 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Battlefield 5 is 312% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro M620 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 1018 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |