Quadro M620 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Quadro M620 and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M620 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M620 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
- Quadro M620 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro M620 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Quadro M620 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 288 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro M620 and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 412 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Battlefield 5 is 312% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 110% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| Quadro M620 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Fortnite is 180% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M620 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Oland | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1018 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |