Quadro M620 vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M620 and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M620 and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M620 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 693% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro M620.
- Quadro M620 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M620 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 444 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Quadro M620 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| Quadro M620 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M620 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | GF100 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1018 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |