GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Quadro P1000

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 560 SE and Quadro P1000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 560 SE will be the best choice, for others Quadro P1000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 560 SE Check Price

Quadro P1000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 560 SE	Quadro P1000
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	47 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 560 SE has 219% more power consumption, than Quadro P1000.
GeForce GTX 560 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P1000 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 560 SE is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro P1000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P1000 is 757 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P1000 - by 14 nm process technology.
GeForce GTX 560 SE is 65 mm longer, than Quadro P1000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P1000 is 2180 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	9−10	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−12	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	30−35	70−75
medium / 1080p	16−18	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Battlefield 5 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	160−170	230−240
medium / 768p	130−140	200−210
ultra / 1080p	65−70	120−130
QHD / 1440p	35−40	100−110
4K / 2160p	27−30	55−60
high / 768p	100−105	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	55−60
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
medium / 768p	70−75	110−120
ultra / 1080p	40−45	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Dota 2 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	10−12	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	4−5	8−9
low / 720p	24−27	55−60
medium / 1080p	10−12	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	16−18	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	27−30
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	70−75	130−140
medium / 1080p	30−35	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Fortnite is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	16−18	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	27−30
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	75−80
medium / 1080p	18−20	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 135% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	60−65	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	95−100
high / 1080p	16−18	45−50
ultra / 1080p	8−9	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	6−7	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	16−18	40−45
medium / 1080p	8−9	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	100−105	120−130
high / 1080p	95−100	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	75−80
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	16−18	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	30−35	80−85
medium / 768p	21−24	50−55
high / 1080p	12−14	27−30
ultra / 1080p	7−8	16−18
4K / 2160p	6−7	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	40−45
high / 768p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 560 SE	Quadro P1000
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Pascal
Code name	GF114	GP107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	20 February 2012	1 February 2017
Pipelines	288	512
Core clock speed	736 MHz	1493 MHz
Boost Clock		1519 MHz
Transistor count	1,950 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	35.33	59.20
Floating-point performance	847.9 gflops	1,894 gflops
Length	210 mm	145 mm
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3828 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	91.87 GB/s	80.19 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	2.1	6.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	54 Mh/s
Optimus		+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Quadro P1000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares