Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro P1000
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro P1000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro P1000.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro P1000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
47 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro P1000 has 213% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro P1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 60 GB more memory, than Quadro P1000.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro P1000 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro P1000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P1000 is 1143 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro P1000 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
20−22
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 136% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Battlefield 5 is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
150−160
230−240
medium / 768p
130−140
200−210
ultra / 1080p
65−70
120−130
QHD / 1440p
35−40
100−110
4K / 2160p
27−30
55−60
high / 768p
95−100
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
70−75
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Dota 2 is 57% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
130−140
medium / 1080p
30−35
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Fortnite is 109% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
60−65
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
95−100
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 97% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
30−35
80−85
medium / 768p
21−24
50−55
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 137% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro P1000
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Pascal
Code name
Skylake GT4e
GP107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
1 February 2017
Pipelines
72
512
Core clock speed
350 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1519 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
59.20
Floating-point performance
1,894 gflops
Length
145 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.2
CUDA
6.1
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
