Quadro K3000M vs Quadro P1000

When comparing Quadro K3000M and Quadro P1000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K3000M and Quadro P1000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:

Main Specs

  Quadro K3000M Quadro P1000
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 47 Watt
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro K3000M has 59% more power consumption, than Quadro P1000.
  • Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro P1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Quadro K3000M and Quadro P1000 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
  • Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro P1000 - in Desktops.
  • Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P1000 - with Pascal.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro P1000 is 839 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
  • Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P1000 - by 14 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro P1000 is 3208 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 7−8 21−24
ultra / 1080p 4−5 12−14
QHD / 1440p 0−1 8−9
4K / 2160p 5−6
low / 720p 18−20 40−45
medium / 1080p 9−10 27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Quadro K3000M.

Full Specs

  Quadro K3000M Quadro P1000
Architecture Kepler Pascal
Code name N14E-Q1 GP107
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Release date 1 June 2012 1 February 2017
Pipelines 576 512
Core clock speed 654 MHz 1493 MHz
Boost Clock 1519 MHz
Transistor count 3,540 million 3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 31.39 59.20
Floating-point performance 753.4 gflops 1,894 gflops
Length 145 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2800 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 80.19 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 5.1 6.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2
CUDA + 6.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 24 Mh/s
Laptop size large
Optimus + +
  Check Price Check Price