Quadro P1000 vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro P1000 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro P1000 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Main Specs
Quadro P1000
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
47 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 425% more power consumption, than Quadro P1000.
Quadro P1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro P1000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro P1000 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro P1000 is 919 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro P1000 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 103 mm longer, than Quadro P1000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P1000 is 2876 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 27% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
35−40
27−30
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
6−7
4K / 2160p
9−10
6−7
low / 720p
70−75
55−60
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro P1000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
210−220
medium / 768p
200−210
190−200
ultra / 1080p
120−130
100−110
QHD / 1440p
100−110
65−70
4K / 2160p
55−60
30−35
high / 768p
170−180
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
85−90
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
QHD / 1440p
20−22
18−20
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−33
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
35−40
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
75−80
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
35−40
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
10−11
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
75−80
60−65
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
medium / 768p
95−100
80−85
high / 1080p
45−50
30−35
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
9−10
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−12
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−12
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Metro Exodus is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
80−85
60−65
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
4K / 2160p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P1000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
Quadro P1000
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GP107
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 February 2017
25 July 2011
Pipelines
512
448
Core clock speed
1493 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1519 MHz
Transistor count
3,300 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
59.20
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,894 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
145 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
N/A
CUDA
6.1
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
