GRID K280Q vs Quadro P2000 Max Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K280Q and Quadro P2000 Max Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K280Q stacks up against Quadro P2000 Max Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K280Q
Quadro P2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Quadro P2000 Max Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q and Quadro P2000 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 470 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 1008 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 148% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 116% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Quadro P2000 Max Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Code name | GK104 | GP107GL |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 July 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |