GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro P2000 Max Q
When choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro P2000 Max Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro P2000 Max Q.
GRID M60 8Q
Quadro P2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Quadro P2000 Max Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro P2000 Max Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 658 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 996 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M60 8Q and Quadro P2000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GRID M60 8Q and Quadro P2000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 61% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 93% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Quadro P2000 Max Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | GM204 | GP107GL |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 July 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1468 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |