Quadro P2000 Max Q vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between Quadro P2000 Max Q and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro P2000 Max Q and Radeon R7 M270DX.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Quadro P2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P2000 Max Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Interface | IGP | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P2000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Quadro P2000 Max Q is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 315 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- Quadro P2000 Max Q is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro P2000 Max Q and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P2000 Max Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GP107GL | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 July 2017 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |