Quadro P2000 Max Q vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Quadro P2000 Max Q and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P2000 Max Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Quadro P2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P2000 Max Q | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro P2000 Max Q.
- Quadro P2000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P2000 Max Q is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 182 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
- Quadro P2000 Max Q is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 808 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro P2000 Max Q and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro P2000 Max Q and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P2000 Max Q | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP107GL | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 July 2017 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |