Quadro P2000 mobile vs Titan X Pascal
When comparing Quadro P2000 mobile and Titan X Pascal, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro P2000 mobile and Titan X Pascal is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Titan X Pascal
Quadro P2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro P2000 mobile | Titan X Pascal | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Titan X Pascal has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Titan X Pascal has 8 GB more memory, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
- Quadro P2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Titan X Pascal - in Desktops.
- Quadro P2000 mobile and Titan X Pascal are build with Pascal architecture.
- Core clock speed of Titan X Pascal is 203 MHz higher, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
- Quadro P2000 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Titan X Pascal - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Titan X Pascal is 3992 MHz higher, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
Quadro P2000 mobile and Titan X Pascal have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
Quadro P2000 mobile and Titan X Pascal have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Far Cry 5 is 74% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Fortnite is 62% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Metro Exodus is 93% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 120−130 | − |
Quadro P2000 mobile and Titan X Pascal have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 103% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 160−170 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 90% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile. |
Full Specs
Quadro P2000 mobile | Titan X Pascal | |
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP107GL | GP102 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 5 July 2017 | 25 July 2016 |
Pipelines | 768 | 3584 |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1418 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 11,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 77.14 | 342.9 |
Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.13 GB/s | 480.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | + |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.98 kh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro P2000 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070
- Quadro P2000 mobile vs Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Titan X Pascal vs GeForce GTX 1070
- Titan X Pascal vs Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Quadro P2000 mobile vs Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Quadro P2000 mobile vs Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Titan X Pascal vs Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Titan X Pascal vs Quadro M6000 24 GB