FirePro M5950 vs Quadro P2000
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and Quadro P2000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and Quadro P2000.
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950
Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
5 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro P2000 has 114% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P2000 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 351 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 6108 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
6−7
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 514% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
55−60
ultra / 1080p
7−8
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
20−22
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 536% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
27−30
110−120
4K / 2160p
18−20
70−75
high / 768p
70−75
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
FirePro M5950 and Quadro P2000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−33
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
5−6
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
6−7
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
7−8
50−55
QHD / 1440p
7−8
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
18−20
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 345% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
60−65
ultra / 1080p
8−9
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
30−35
4K / 2160p
3−4
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
110−120
medium / 1080p
10−12
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 544% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
40−45
130−140
high / 1080p
8−9
70−75
ultra / 1080p
4−5
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
9−10
low / 720p
9−10
70−75
medium / 1080p
5−6
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 680% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
9−10
70−75
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
20−22
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
7−8
50−55
ultra / 1080p
5−6
27−30
4K / 2160p
2−3
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 611% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
55−60
high / 768p
30−35
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 48% more, than FirePro M5950.
Full Specs
FirePro M5950
Quadro P2000
Architecture
Terascale 2
Pascal
Code name
Whistler-XT
GP106
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
13 April 2011
6 February 2017
Pipelines
480
1024
Core clock speed
725 MHz
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
17.40
94.72
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
3,031 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
160 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
140.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
67 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
MXM-A
Check Price
Check Price