GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro P2000

In this comparison between GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 160M will be the best choice, for others Quadro P2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Quadro P2000 Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	5 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro P2000 has 25% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P2000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 424 MHz higher, than Quadro P2000.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	1−2	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	0−1	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	65−70
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	250−260
medium / 768p	27−30	220−230
ultra / 1080p	7−8	180−190
QHD / 1440p	−	110−120
4K / 2160p	−	70−75
high / 768p	16−18	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P2000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	30−33
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	0−1	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	30−33
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	21−24	180−190
medium / 1080p	0−1	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	0−1	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	65−70
low / 768p	18−20	140−150
medium / 768p	−	130−140
high / 1080p	0−1	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	24−27
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	0−1	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	75−80	130−140
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	0−1	130−140
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	−	50−55
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	55−60
high / 768p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro P2000
Architecture	G9x	Pascal
Code name	N10E-GS1	GP106
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	2 March 2009	6 February 2017
Pipelines	64	1024
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	1076 MHz
Boost Clock		1480 MHz
Transistor count	505 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec	94.72
Floating-point performance	192 gflops	3,031 gflops
Length		201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed		7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s	140.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.19 kh/s
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Laptop size	large
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro P2000

GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares