GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Quadro P2000
When comparing GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Quadro P2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Quadro P2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
5 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
Quadro P2000 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 491 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 6058 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
2−3
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
high / 1080p
18−20
55−60
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
QHD / 1440p
3−4
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
40−45
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
low / 768p
180−190
250−260
medium / 768p
150−160
220−230
ultra / 1080p
80−85
180−190
QHD / 1440p
45−50
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
120−130
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
80−85
110−120
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
5−6
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
80−85
medium / 1080p
14−16
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
85−90
180−190
medium / 1080p
40−45
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
QHD / 1440p
6−7
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
40−45
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 195% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
low / 768p
70−75
140−150
medium / 768p
65−70
130−140
high / 1080p
21−24
70−75
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−35
QHD / 1440p
1−2
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
9−10
low / 720p
21−24
70−75
medium / 1080p
10−11
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 230% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
low / 768p
100−110
130−140
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
21−24
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 153% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
low / 768p
40−45
130−140
medium / 768p
27−30
85−90
high / 1080p
14−16
50−55
ultra / 1080p
9−10
27−30
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−33
55−60
high / 768p
45−50
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
Quadro P2000
Architecture
G9x
Pascal
Code name
N10E-GTX
GP106
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
6 February 2017
Pipelines
256
1024
Core clock speed
585 MHz
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
94.72
Floating-point performance
3,031 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
160 Bit
Memory clock speed
950 MHz
7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
140.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price